There is no way I would do that!

The impact of social arrangements on our decisions and judgments

Safety DiagnosisI had the privilege last week of meeting a new group of people as they commenced their adventure into the world of better understanding people and how we make decisions and judgments about risk. I felt especially privileged to be able to present a short story to the group on my own ‘learning adventure’ in risk and safety. To be welcomed into a small community as it is forming is a treat. I look forward to staying in touch and continuing our relationship as the learning continues for us all.

As I reflect on my own learning over the past two years, I recognise the change in my thinking around risk, safety and people. I have ‘unlearned’ as much as I have learned, as I continue on the ‘adventure’. I’ve changed the way I think, the way I work, and most importantly the way that I relate to others.

If you’re thinking this sounds a little evangelical, as though I have been ‘converted’ from one way of thinking to another, as if I have adopted a new religion and become a ‘born again risk and safety consultant’, you’re probably right. By beginning this adventure, by being open to learning and unlearning, I have been converted, I do think differently, and I love it!

So, what was the ‘tipping point’ for me in this conversion? Why do I now see the world through the lens of social psychology, (that is, thinking about the impact of our social arrangements on our decisions and judgments)? What caused this change in thinking for me?

A clue to the answer lays in the title of this piece, “There is no way that I would do that!” One of the most challenging aspects from a learning perspective from my study has been to understand the incredible impact that our social arrangements can have on decisions and judgments taken by individuals.

http://www.safetyrisk.net/there-is-no-way-i-would-do-that/

A Learning Adventure in Understanding Risk and People

When you open your mind to learning, ‘unlearning’ and to a new and different way of thinking, it can be refreshing, liberating and motivating.

In May 2012, I commenced my  learning adventure in understanding risk and people. This is when I started my post-graduate studies in the Social Psychology of Risk under Dr Robert Long through the Australian Catholic University in Canberra, Australia.

When I think of these studies, I think of an ‘adventure’ which is a term that my good friend Gabrielle Carlton and I thought of when we were sharing our learning with a group of people recently. ‘Adventure’ seems the most adequate way to describe a journey that is not linear, that is filled with lot’s of ups and downs, and one where, despite having a broad plan in place and knowing the general direction you are travelling in, you’re just not quite sure where it will take you until you arrive! This does not mean that it is not organised or well thought out, quite the opposite in fact, it is so well thought out that the program is great balance between planning and the ability to adapt as needed. Just like a good risk management program!

At the start of this ‘adventure’, I thought I knew quite a bit about risk, safety and people. After all, I’d been involved in the risk and safety industry for most of my working life, it’s what I do. I’d completed an undergraduate degree in Occupational Health and Safety, attended numerous training and development programs, and I’d worked in some senior roles in large and diverse organisations over 20+ years. I wasn’t a novice, but boy did I have some learning to do when it came to really understanding how to deal with risk, safety and people.

For instance, despite my previous studies, training and experience, I had no understanding of the impact of semiotics on our unconscious and what this meant for decisions and judgments about risk. I had no clue about the power of words and I didn’t know that so much that goes on around us impacts on our decisions.

I didn’t understand that most of our decisions are made in our unconscious mind, and I thought that effective safety meant more control, clear standards, good process and consequence management.

I’ve learned a lot in just under two years. I’ve read more than 50+ books and almost three times as many articles, publications and journals in that time. I’ve been welcomed into some wonderful learning communities and I’ve been fortunate to build some trusting relationships with close friends who are also ‘on the adventure’. Compare this to my under-graduate degree where I reckon I read no more than 10-15 books and maybe 40 journals in six years. That didn’t feel like an ‘adventure’ in learning, it was a chore, it was about passing exams and completing assignments. It was full of science, law and engineering, all important in understanding the world we live and work in, but no understanding of people and risk. In other words, compared to my previous studies, with this current post-graduate program, I’ve been doing a lot of critical thinking lately, and I love it!

One of the most important parts of this learning ‘adventure’ is the learning communities that have been created. For example, I was privileged last week to meet with a new Cohort of students who commenced their own learning adventure in the Social Psychology of Risk. I was asked to present a short story on my learning of the past two years. I was pleased to share my story which focused on three key areas:

  • What I used to do (and think was right)
  • What I’ve learned
  • How I go about things now (i.e how do I apply the learning of social psychology of risk in my work)

I also shared a little about my experiences as a study and the key things that I’ve learned over the past few years as a student.

People seem most interested in how I apply my learning to both my work and personal life now. So what are some of the things that I do differently now?

  • I listen a hell of a lot more than I used to. For me safety used to be about ‘telling’, ‘instructing’, ‘policing’ and ‘advising’. Now days, I’d prefer to listen to others, understand whether they know how to deal with risk and support them in discovering things for themselves. The key to this is good quality conversations and a focus on ‘others’ not ‘self’.
  • I look at things with a different lens. While I still see cords on the ground, guards on machines and mobile plant working it’s way through a site, I’m now much more interested in observing and listening to people, understanding them better and supporting them to learn, instead of controlling them in the name of compliance.
  • I think about how different groups work together in an environment. When I used to talk about culture, my definition and understanding were very limited. Now, I’m engaged by organisations to assist them to understand and/or support them in developing their culture so that it becomes more mature and ‘risk savvy’.
  • I take more time to reflect which helps me make sense of things.
  • I engage in community, with friends that I trust, to share and test my learning and ideas.
  • I embrace my own fallibility as a human being, I understand that I’m not perfect and will make mistakes, and I know this is all part of learning.
  • I read, explore ideas and think more critically. I don’t accept simple answers and ‘pyramids’ as the solutions to complex and challenging problems. If a problem is complex, I now understand that the solution (if there is one) is probably complex too.
  • I understand ‘wicked problems’ as ones that can only be tackled, rather than solved.
  • I feel liberated and free that I don’t need to know everything and that I have a lot more to learn. This allows me to be more humble and support others to learn too.

These are just some of the key things that I do differently.

For those who are interested in my presentation to the students last week, I’ve attached my slides from the presentation. I’m happy to share this learning with everyone as I know that will help my learning too.

I’ve been fortunate to travel on this exciting adventure over the past two years, and I have no intention of ‘getting off the ride’.

When you open your mind to learning, ‘unlearning’ and to a new and different way of thinking, it can be refreshing, liberating and motivating.

Is there anything that you could ‘unlearn’ and open your mind to so that you can see the world through a new lens? 

Understanding How People Make Decisions and Judgments

Robert Sams presented at the 2015 National Workers Compensation Summit in Melbourne NSW on 25 February.

In the midst of presentations that mainly focused on numbers, graphs and data, most of which were about how to ‘control’ workers compensation (including people, organisations and stake holders), Rob’s presentation focused on better understanding people. (you can see the other presentations here – http://www.slideshare.net/informaoz/tag/NWC15)

The key question Rob asked was ‘How can we influence, if we don’t understand how people make decisions and judgments?

Rob’s One Brain, Three Minds presentation (see www.humandymensions.com) supports people and organisations to better understand decision making when it comes to risk. The importance of understanding the difference between conscious and non-conscious ‘thinking’, and importantly understanding how we communicate with the non-conscious mind, is critical in dealing with risk.

In an industry where many are focused on control, where discussion about ‘safety culture’ is about numbers, and that is addicted to binary thinking, the approach we take at Dolphyn is very different.

If you’d like to learn more, or if you’re interested in hearing any of the team at Dolphyn presenting One Brain, Three Minds, you can get in touch at contact@dolphyn.com.au or call Rob on 0424 037 112

PS: Apologies that the videos don’t play in the presentation, damn PowerPoint! I’m on Mac and I ain’t going back 🙂

 

 

Experiential Learning

There are plenty of options for organisations to consider when it comes to learning and training programs for risk and safety. In fact, just working through the array of programs can be difficult enough, let alone sit through programs that often ‘flood’ participants with information, and focus on competency rather than experience and learning.

If you’d like to learn about a different approach to learning, why not contact Dolphyn to talk through the range of experiential learning programs we are able to provide, courtesy of Dr Rob Long from Human Dymensions. Check out Rob’s video for more detail.

http://www.safetyrisk.net/experiential-learning-for-safety-and-risk/

Could Understanding Grey be the Silver Bullet?

A key theme of the feedback that I receive from my Blogs is that some of the concepts are difficult to fully comprehend because what I write about is not always black or white (or what we know of as binary thinking). That is, it can be ambiguous, grey and messy. People are often looking for a right or wrong way to do things, for the ‘method’ that works best, for the approach that ‘will sort things’. If you like, we seem to be on a mission for the elusive ‘silver bullet’.

http://www.safetyrisk.net/could-understanding-grey-be-the-silver-bullet/

Competition Winner Announced – Well Done Dave Gettins

Congratulations Date Gettins, you’re coming to the Social Psychology of Risk Conference on Dolpyhn, good one mate!

http://www.safetyrisk.net/what-is-excessive-regulation-doing-to-us-all-competition-winner/

Balancing Between Tightly and Loosely Coupled Systems

My last two articles on art and helping, generated feedback and questions that are worthy of further explanation. Amongst the feedback was that I ‘systems bash’ when I write about risk and safety.

In this piece I explore different options for how ‘systems’ may be arranged including Karl Wrick’s model of tightly and loosely coupled systems.

http://www.safetyrisk.net/balancing-tight-and-loose-coupled-systems/

Out of Your Unconscious Mind

To understand and discern risk, we make decisions and judgments about uncertainty. We are often required to do this without the benefit of unlimited time, or by using rational and logical thinking in our conscious mind. This is because risk is subjective and decisions about risk often need to be made quickly.

http://www.safetyrisk.net/out-of-your-unconscious-mind/

Are you Creating an ‘Obeyiance’ Culture?

Some organisations are so fixated on meeting their legal requirements (and the system) that they become blinded to the impact that this has on culture. Companies that focus their attention solely on a system create a culture that demands obedience, in what I refer to as an ‘Obeyience Culture’ – obedience in the name of compliance. This type of culture fosters fear, silence and blame, all of which lead to organisations where surprises are the norm, and unusual events appear from nowhere because people in those organisations do not reports mistakes, near misses or ‘oh dear’ moments. This is because it’s not how things are done in an ‘Obeyience Culture’. So why do these organisations require obedience?

http://www.safetyrisk.net/are-you-creating-an-obeyience-culture/